In article <[email protected]> (at Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:16:02 -0800), David Brown <[email protected]> says:
> patch-2.6.15-rt1-1 has the ipv6 patch yet is smaller than the initial
> patch. I created the patch using:
> $ diff -uprN linux-2.6.15 linux-2.6.15-rt1 > patch-2.6.15-rt1-1
>
> Is this not the way you did it? I noticed different headers in my
> patch vs. the patch posted. Really I'm concerned about missing
> anything in the patch, considering it's 700+ lines smaller.
I have linux-2.6 git tree and I did something like this:
$ cd linux-2.6
$ patch -p1 < /tmp/patch-2.6.15-rt1
hack, hack, hack...
$ patch -p1 -R < /tmp/patch-2.6.15-rt1
$ git reset
$ git diff
--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
