Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers

Manfred Spraul <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This patch contains a bug fix for large buffers. Originally, if a tx 
>  buffer to be sent was larger then the maximum size of the tx descriptor,
> 
>  it would overwrite other control bits. In this patch, the buffer is 
>  split over multiple descriptors. Also, the fragments are now setup in 
>  forward order.
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>
> 
>  Rediffed against forcedeth 0.48
>  Signed-Off-By: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>

I've assumed that this patch if From: Ayaz.   Please confirm.

If so, it should have had

	From: Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>

at the top of the changlog, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: + netfilter-fix-handling-of-module-param-dcc_timeout-in-ip_conntrack_ircc.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by Date: Re: + netfilter-fix-handling-of-module-param-dcc_timeout-in-ip_conntrack_ircc.patch added to -mm tree
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers
• Next by thread: [patch 2/9] slab: minor cleanup to kmem_cache_alloc_node
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]