Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers
From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:33:55 +0100
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr-FR; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050923 Fedora/1.7.12-1.5.1

Ayaz Abdulla wrote:

If you look at the code, I do not set the NV_TX2_VALID bit (stored innp->tx_flags) in the first tx descriptor

You are right: tx_flags starts as 0 and is only set to np->tx_flagsafter the first tx descriptor was set up.

I overlooked that point, sorry.

Jeff: Could you add the patch to your tree?

--
   Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers
  - From: Ayaz Abdulla <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: usb: replace __setup("nousb") with __module_param_call
Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: TSO fix for large buffers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux