Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Optimize select/poll by putting small data sets on the stack

On Wednesday 04 January 2006 01:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> Hmm, can you include the same change for compat_sys_select()?
> When that was introduced, sys_select and compat_sys_select were
> basically identical in their code, which makes it a lot easier
> to verify that the compat_ version is correct.

Ah good point. I forgot about those. Will fix them up for the next version
of the patch.

> Interestingly, doing a diff between sys_select and compat_sys_select
> in the current kernel seems to suggest that they are both buggy
> in that they miss checks for failing __put_user, but in /different/
> places.

Ok will do a sync first.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] [RFC] Optimize select/poll by putting small data sets on the stack
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Optimize select/poll by putting small data sets on the stack
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 8/11] Time: i386 Conversion - part 4: ACPI PM variable renaming and config change.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Optimize select/poll by putting small data sets on the stack
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Optimize select/poll by putting small data sets on the stack
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]