On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:21:55AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:11:46PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
>
> >>I guess I was hoping to try to keep it simple, and just have two
> >>variants, the __ version would require the caller to do the locking.
> >
> >
> >I see - one point is that the two/three underscore versions make
> >it clear that preempt is required, though, but it might be a bit
> >over-complicated as you say.
> >
> >Well, its up to you - please rearrange the patch as you wish and merge
> >up?
> >
>
> OK I will push it upstream - thanks!
>
> We can revisit details again when some smoke clears from the
> coming 2.6.16 merge cycle?
Sure - we can also go further and the optimize operations on the
remaining counters.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
