Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:11:46PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
I guess I was hoping to try to keep it simple, and just have two
variants, the __ version would require the caller to do the locking.
I see - one point is that the two/three underscore versions make
it clear that preempt is required, though, but it might be a bit
over-complicated as you say.
Well, its up to you - please rearrange the patch as you wish and merge
up?
OK I will push it upstream - thanks!
We can revisit details again when some smoke clears from the
coming 2.6.16 merge cycle?
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
