Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Mon, 2 Jan 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Also, wouldn't it be better to track kmem_cache_alloc and
> kmem_cache_alloc_node instead?

I believe they are very interested in when kmalloc and kfree are used,
since those are the ones for the generic slabs.  And even then, they are
only profiling the ones that use a dynamic allocation.  (the kmalloc and
kfree of sizeof(x) is not profiled).  This was brought up earlier in the

-- Steve

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux