Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 12/30/05, Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Attached is a variant that was refreshed against 2.6.15-rc7 and fixes
> the logical bug that your compile error fix made ;)
> It should be cachep->objsize not csizep->cs_size.

Isn't there any other way to do this patch other than making kzalloc()
and kstrdup() inline? I would like to see something like this in the
mainline but making them inline is not acceptable because they
increase kernel text a lot.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux