Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>Em Dom, 2006-01-01 Ã s 19:49 +0100, Mark v Wolher escreveu:
>> So, Mauro (or somebody from list), have you any idea, what could be
>> wrong?
> hmm.. have you sent the patch to the list?
Yes, it was only a (bad) try to solve the problem. The point is, that there is
some weird problem in the estimating, or something (number of loops?).
The oops and the patch are on lkml site in this thread, I would give you a
link, but lkml seems to be down for me.
[the patch helps in some way, but didn't solve the problem]
all the best,
--
Jiri Slaby www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
\_.-^-._ [email protected] _.-^-._/
B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
