Re: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional

> It's under CONFIG_EMBEDDED. Think uclibc. Think systems without
> interactive shells.

Interactive or not has absolutely nothing to do with this.  And other
libcs have the same issues wrt to backtraces.  And finally, there is
unfortunately no way to prevent somebody from using glibc on an
"embedded" kernel and I have no interest in getting "bug reports" caused
by this kind of user error.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
  - From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
  - From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
  - From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
  - From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: userspace breakage
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0 of 20] [RFC] ipath - PathScale InfiniPath driver
Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]