> This adds configurable sysenter support on x86. This saves about 5k on > small systems. You not only remove the sysenter support but also the vdso. And the later is a very bad idea. It is already today basically impossible to have reliable backtraces without the vdso and the unwind info it contains for signal handlers. And things can only get worse in future. The magic heuristics in the compiler are not reliable. It's simply the wrong face, this in a interface between the kernel and the libc, the compiler should not have such knowledge. The vdso should be mandatory for all configurations. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
- References:
- [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
- From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
- Prev by Date: Re: Suspend to {mem,disk} broken in 2.6.15-rc6/rc7 on my T42
- Next by Date: hfsplus oops in 2.6.14
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
- Next by thread: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] Make sysenter support optional
- Index(es):