On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 04:15:22AM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote: > So, a GPL application running on top of a BSD-licensed kernel > (or library) is illegal? I doubt it... applications don't link with the kernel, modules do i don't know if that makes modules legal or not, but it's certainly not clear cut - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- References:
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: "Robert W. Fuller" <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Diego Calleja <[email protected]>
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-rt4: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check!
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Previous by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Next by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Index(es):
 |