El Thu, 22 Dec 2005 18:56:38 -0800, Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]> escribió: > That's entirely debatable and I would recommend the original poster > seek legal advice on this as there are many people who will claim > loading GPLd modules is paramount to linking and therefore this is a > violation. So, a GPL application running on top of a BSD-licensed kernel (or library) is illegal? I doubt it... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- References:
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: "Robert W. Fuller" <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: "Jeff V. Merkey" <[email protected]>
- Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Prev by Date: Re: remove incorrect dependancy on CONFIG_APM
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-rt4: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check!
- Previous by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Next by thread: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers
- Index(es):
 |