Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

[Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>]

On Wed, 2005-12-21 01:22:12 -0800, David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:11:51 +0100
> 
> > Could some of you post the result of the following command on your machines :

VAX KA650 (simulated), 4k pages (hw-size is 512 Bytes, though),
L1_CACHE_BYTES=32

# grep "size-" /proc/slabinfo |grep -v DMA|cut -c1-40
size-131072            0      0 131072  
size-65536             0      0  65536  
size-32768             0      0  32768  
size-16384             0      0  16384  
size-8192              0      0   8192  
size-4096             21     21   4096  
size-2048             39     42   2060  
size-1024             18     21   1036  
size-512              70     70    524  
size-256               5     14    268  
size-192             722    722    204  
size-128             145    168    140  
size-96              382    396    108  
size-32             1040   1092     44  
size-64              338    350     76  

MfG, JBG

-- 
Jan-Benedict Glaw       jbglaw@lug-owl.de    . +49-172-7608481             _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg  _ _ O
 für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger"  | im Internet! |   im Irak!   O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature