Re: [POLL] SLAB : Are the 32 and 192 bytes caches really usefull on x86_64 machines ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:11:51 +0100

> Could some of you post the result of the following command on your machines :

sparc64, PAGE_SIZE=8192, L1_CACHE_BYTES=32

size-131072            0      0 131072  
size-65536            13     13  65536  
size-32768             2      2  32768  
size-16384             2      2  16384  
size-8192             67     67   8192  
size-4096             75     76   4096  
size-2048            303    308   2048  
size-1024            176    176   1024  
size-512             251    255    512  
size-256             217    217    256  
size-192            1230   1230    192  
size-128             106    122    128  
size-96             1098   1134     96  
size-64            29387  30226     64  
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux