Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> In other words: if people didn't mix up issues that had nothing to do with
> this into it, I'd be happier. I've already said that a mutex that does
> _not_ replace semaphore (and doesn't mess with naming) is acceptable.
>

At least I'm very happy with Linus' decision.  Can we now end this thread,
and move forward.  You may bring up your issues in what comes next.

Thank you,

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: sungem hangs in atomic if netconsole enabled but no carrier
Next by Date: Re: About 4k kernel stack size....
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
Next by thread: Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]