Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch

On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> In other words: if people didn't mix up issues that had nothing to do with
> this into it, I'd be happier. I've already said that a mutex that does
> _not_ replace semaphore (and doesn't mess with naming) is acceptable.
>

At least I'm very happy with Linus' decision.  Can we now end this thread,
and move forward.  You may bring up your issues in what comes next.

Thank you,

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Nicolas Pitre <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: sungem hangs in atomic if netconsole enabled but no carrier
• Next by Date: Re: About 4k kernel stack size....
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]