Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch

On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 09:49 -0800, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>         Doesn't this corrupt caller saved registers?

Looks like it. I _really_ don't like calling functions from inline asm.
It's not nice. Can't we use atomic_dec_return() for this?

-- 
dwmw2

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
  - From: Zwane Mwaikambo <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH rc6] block: Fix CDROMEJECT to work in more cases
Next by Date: [RFC] i2c: Combined ST m41txx i2c rtc chip driver (was: [PATCH 1/1] Added support of ST m41t85 rtc chip)
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
Next by thread: Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]