On Tue, Dec 20 2005, Ben Collins wrote:
> However, I don't see the issue with using READ. We know this isn't a
> write operation, we are sending a single command with no data. I know
> you say reads are precious, but 3 requests for something that isn't
> going to happen very often doesn't seem that bad.
It's not a READ either!
Yes I'm being stubborn, but my point stands. I'm not changing something
that is perfectly valid, "just because". If it finds a bug (you
mentioned ide-cd, I still want the details on that when you have the
time), then it's all for the better since it would bite us for other
paths as well.
In summary - it's not a bug, it doesn't need fixing.
> As for the 0x01, I don't know. The eject -s code does the exact same
> thing (AMR, SS:0x01, SS:0x02), so I copied the same mechanism because it
> is known to work.
Lets leave that out for now then, yes?
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
