On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> on x86 the fastpath is the same for both basically.. is there a
> fundamental reason it can't be for ARM?
ARM prior ARM architecture level 6 (which means about 99% of all ARM
processors in the field currently) cannot do an atomic
decrement/increment. It must be done manually with interrupt disabled.
The only truly atomic instruction it has is a swap which lays itself
pretty well for mutex support.
Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
- Re: [patch 04/15] Generic Mutex Subsystem, add-atomic-call-func-x86_64.patch
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]