On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:44:53PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Well, so much for "quick" brainstorming on the issue... Don't bother > > flaming me for any misunderstanding or misconception : ) > > That's empty reply for you, then. > Pavel Argh. Looks like I said the opposite of what I was trying to express. Corrections are of course warmly welcome, even if the tone might not exactly be nice. > [mm layer already discards most usefull pages last, so Rafael's > patches do the right thing] So I wasted my time and will now quit wasting yours. Thanks anyway : ) Chris
Attachment:
pgpQzPji7fFCk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable (was: Re: [PATCH][mm] swsusp: limit image size)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach (was: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable)
- From: Christian Trefzer <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach (was: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable)
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable (was: Re: [PATCH][mm] swsusp: limit image size)
- Prev by Date: 2.6.16-rc5-mm2 - kzalloc() considered harmful for debugging.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] micro optimization of cache_estimate in slab.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach (was: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable)
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable (was: Re: [PATCH][mm] swsusp: limit image size)
- Index(es):
 |