Re: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach (was: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable)

> Well, so much for "quick" brainstorming on the issue... Don't bother
> flaming me for any misunderstanding or misconception : )

That's empty reply for you, then.
								Pavel
[mm layer already discards most usefull pages last, so Rafael's
patches do the right thing]
-- 
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach
  - From: Christian Trefzer <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable (was: Re: [PATCH][mm] swsusp: limit image size)
  - From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach (was: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable)
  - From: Christian Trefzer <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/12]: MUTEX: Implement mutexes
Next by Date: Re: swsusp: documentation fixes
Previous by thread: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach (was: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable)
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]