Re: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach (was: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable)

> Well, so much for "quick" brainstorming on the issue... Don't bother
> flaming me for any misunderstanding or misconception : )

That's empty reply for you, then.
								Pavel
[mm layer already discards most usefull pages last, so Rafael's
patches do the right thing]
-- 
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach
    • From: Christian Trefzer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable (was: Re: [PATCH][mm] swsusp: limit image size)
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach (was: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable)
    • From: Christian Trefzer <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/12]: MUTEX: Implement mutexes
• Next by Date: Re: swsusp: documentation fixes
• Previous by thread: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach (was: Re: [RFC/RFT] swsusp: image size tunable)
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] swsusp: brainstorming on a freaked-out approach
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]