Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access

On 12/17/05, Vijay Sampath <[email protected]> wrote:
> >         Leaves me confused :)  Description and patch should match?
>
> Description has a typo. Patch is accurate. Unless somebody more
> knowledgeable than me on the intricacies would want to differ.
>
> >         Something is wrong here?  Your patch should not alter dontdiff.
>
> It didn't. 2.4 kernel doesn't have dontdiff, so I had to download it.
> But I only downloaded to one of the directories, hence the messed up
> output. Maybe dontdiff should have "dontdiff" as one of the files not
> to diff! :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vijay
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
    • From: Vijay Sampath <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] i386: always use 4k stacks
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
• Next by thread: [PATCH] EDAC with new sysfs interface - remove /proc interfaces on -mm3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]