Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access

>         Leaves me confused :)  Description and patch should match?

Description has a typo. Patch is accurate. Unless somebody more
knowledgeable than me on the intricacies would want to differ.

>         Something is wrong here?  Your patch should not alter dontdiff.

It didn't. 2.4 kernel doesn't have dontdiff, so I had to download it.
But I only downloaded to one of the directories, hence the messed up
output. Maybe dontdiff should have "dontdiff" as one of the files not
to diff! :)

Thanks,

Vijay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
    • From: Vijay Sampath <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
    • From: Vijay Sampath <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/12]: MUTEX: Implement mutexes
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]