Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access

>         Leaves me confused :)  Description and patch should match?

Description has a typo. Patch is accurate. Unless somebody more
knowledgeable than me on the intricacies would want to differ.

>         Something is wrong here?  Your patch should not alter dontdiff.

It didn't. 2.4 kernel doesn't have dontdiff, so I had to download it.
But I only downloaded to one of the directories, hence the messed up
output. Maybe dontdiff should have "dontdiff" as one of the files not
to diff! :)

Thanks,

Vijay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
  - From: Vijay Sampath <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
  - From: Vijay Sampath <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/12]: MUTEX: Implement mutexes
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] MTD (kernel 2.4.32): kernel stuck in tight loop occasionally on flash access
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]