Christoph> Is there some political plot going where pathscale
Christoph> folks are forcing you to send this out in this scheme?
Christoph> Otherwise I couldn't explain the code quality
Christoph> magnitudes lower than normally expected from your
Christoph> merges.
No political plot -- this posting was an RFC in the literal sense,
with no expectation that the code is mergable as-is. I just want to
get comments early so that we have a better idea of what needs to be
fixed. For example, what's your feeling about sysctls in drivers?
BTW, Pathscale people -- please respond to the comments that are made
about your driver...
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
