On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:48:54PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> having sysctls that set values also settable through module parameters
> under /sys/module, code inside #ifndef __KERNEL__ so include files can
> be shared with other PathScale code, code in ipath_i2c.c that might be
> simplified by using drivers/i2c, etc. I'd like to try to get a sense
> of whether I'm being too picky or whether PathScale really does need
> to fix these up before the driver is merged.
Yes, please fix this stuff before. The current driver looks like a horrible
mess.
Is there some political plot going where pathscale folks are forcing you to
send this out in this scheme? Otherwise I couldn't explain the code quality
magnitudes lower than normally expected from your merges.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
