Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:16:45PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> So who should I put as the author?  You or Geert (or whatever attributions
> might have been in said big patch)?  Incidentally,  ADBREQ_RAW had leaked
> into mainline (sans definition) in 2.3.45-pre2, which was Feb 13 2000, i.e.
> more than 1.5 year before your commit, so there's quite a chunk of history
> missing...
> 
> I'm serious, BTW - I certainly would have no problem preserving attribution,
> but it simply hadn't been there.  CVS logs are only as good as the data
> being put there by committers...

With some archaeology...  It looks like drivers/macintosh part is from
Geert (with chunks from benh? not sure) circa Dec 2000; adb.h is a missing
piece of earlier patch (one that had leaked in Feb 2000, $DEITY knowns how
much older it is)...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux