Hi,
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > You separate the definition from the check, now you push the
> > responsibility to get the order right to the header users.
> > Sorry, but I prefer to fix the header dependencies than scatter things
> > which belong together over multiple files.
>
> For 2.6.16 I'll submit a patch to merge asm/irq.h and asm/hardirq.h.
This will likely break m68k header dependencies.
> Until then this is the much better fix because it doesn't require
> pointless include reordering all over the tree.
In this case I would prefer to leave it as is, as it conflicts with m68k
tree and I would prefer to fix the mess only once.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
