Re: [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Adrian Bunk wrote:

It's a problem introduced by your patch because the resulting defconfig
file becomes _wrong_ by your change, and other changes in the defconfig
are thereby hidden.
...

No, CONFIG_BROKEN=y in a defconfig file is a bug.

Indeed, but that's not the point. A defconfig file should be the result of running one of the various configuration targets; yours are hand-patched. If you run the defconfig target, it will copy the config file and run oldconfig, thus resulting in a different configuration file (because options may now be gone and hence disabled) than what was in the defconfig, and thus people may come to the wrong conclusion that if a driver is enabled in a defconfig file, it will be built.

   Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux