Re: [2.6 patch] defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:44:37PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 08:31:18PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:21:10PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 07:52:12PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > defconfig's shouldn't set CONFIG_BROKEN=y.
> > > 
> > > NACK.  This changes other configuration options in addition, for example
> > > in collie_defconfig:
> > > 
> > > -CONFIG_MTD_OBSOLETE_CHIPS=y
> > > -# CONFIG_MTD_AMDSTD is not set
> > > -CONFIG_MTD_SHARP=y
> > > -# CONFIG_MTD_JEDEC is not set
> > 
> > That's not a problem introduced by my patch.
> 
> It's a problem introduced by your patch because the resulting defconfig
> file becomes _wrong_ by your change, and other changes in the defconfig
> are thereby hidden.
>...


No, CONFIG_BROKEN=y in a defconfig file is a bug.

Either the defconfig doesn't use BROKEN code in which case it's simply 
wrong, or it's a wrong workaround (as in the CONFIG_MTD_SHARP case) for 
a wrong BROKEN dependency.


And it's a dangerous workaround:

Consider e.g. that "both marked as obsolete and BROKEN" are the best 
candidates for "remove obsolete code" cleanups - and there goes your 
driver to /dev/null ...


> Russell King

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/