Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:14:13AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:42:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > scsi/sd.c is currently getting an ICE.  None of the new SAS code compiles,
> > > due to extensive use of anonymous unions.
> > 
> > This is just the headers in the luben code which need redoing completely
> > because they're doing other stupid things like using bitfields for on the
> > wire structures.
> 
> Don't think so (you're referring to Jeff's git-sas-jg.patch?).  It dies
> with current -linus tree.

I didn't mean sd.c but the anonymous union usage.  Everything that's stuffed
into include/scsi/sas/ in -mm is far from mergeable.  It's really badly done
headers that need to be redone.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux