Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:01:26AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Can you please apply the following patch then? > > > > > > Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement > > > > OK. > > > > Thus far I have this: > > Would it be possible to drop support for gcc 3.0 too? Spose so - I don't know what people are using out there. > AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the > advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make > the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain. There are a few places in the tree which refuse to compile with 3.1 and 3.2. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- References:
- [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
- Index(es):
 |