Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Can you please apply the following patch then?
>
> Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement
OK.
Thus far I have this:
From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
There's one scsi driver which doesn't compile due to weird __VA_ARGS__ tricks
and the rather useful scsi/sd.c is currently getting an ICE. None of the new
SAS code compiles, due to extensive use of anonymous unions. The V4L guys are
very good at exploiting the gcc-2.95.x macro expansion bug (_why_ does each
driver need to implement its own debug macros?) and various people keep on
sneaking in anonymous unions.
Plus anonymous unions are rather useful.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
---
dev/null | 29 -----------------------------
include/linux/compiler.h | 2 --
init/main.c | 7 +------
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff -puN init/main.c~abandon-gcc-295x init/main.c
--- devel/init/main.c~abandon-gcc-295x 2005-12-13 00:48:17.000000000 -0800
+++ devel-akpm/init/main.c 2005-12-13 00:48:17.000000000 -0800
@@ -58,11 +58,6 @@
* This is one of the first .c files built. Error out early
* if we have compiler trouble..
*/
-#if __GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ == 96
-#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
-#error This compiler cannot compile correctly with frame pointers enabled
-#endif
-#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
#include <asm/smp.h>
@@ -74,7 +69,7 @@
* To avoid associated bogus bug reports, we flatly refuse to compile
* with a gcc that is known to be too old from the very beginning.
*/
-#if __GNUC__ < 2 || (__GNUC__ == 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 95)
+#if __GNUC__ < 3
#error Sorry, your GCC is too old. It builds incorrect kernels.
#endif
diff -L include/linux/compiler-gcc2.h -puN include/linux/compiler-gcc2.h~abandon-gcc-295x /dev/null
--- devel/include/linux/compiler-gcc2.h
+++ /dev/null 2003-09-15 06:40:47.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-/* Never include this file directly. Include <linux/compiler.h> instead. */
-
-/* These definitions are for GCC v2.x. */
-
-/* Somewhere in the middle of the GCC 2.96 development cycle, we implemented
- a mechanism by which the user can annotate likely branch directions and
- expect the blocks to be reordered appropriately. Define __builtin_expect
- to nothing for earlier compilers. */
-#include <linux/compiler-gcc.h>
-
-#if __GNUC_MINOR__ < 96
-# define __builtin_expect(x, expected_value) (x)
-#endif
-
-#define __attribute_used__ __attribute__((__unused__))
-
-/*
- * The attribute `pure' is not implemented in GCC versions earlier
- * than 2.96.
- */
-#if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 96
-# define __attribute_pure__ __attribute__((pure))
-# define __attribute_const__ __attribute__((__const__))
-#endif
-
-/* GCC 2.95.x/2.96 recognize __va_copy, but not va_copy. Actually later GCC's
- * define both va_copy and __va_copy, but the latter may go away, so limit this
- * to this header */
-#define va_copy __va_copy
diff -puN include/linux/compiler.h~abandon-gcc-295x include/linux/compiler.h
--- devel/include/linux/compiler.h~abandon-gcc-295x 2005-12-13 00:48:17.000000000 -0800
+++ devel-akpm/include/linux/compiler.h 2005-12-13 00:48:17.000000000 -0800
@@ -42,8 +42,6 @@ extern void __chk_io_ptr(void __iomem *)
# include <linux/compiler-gcc4.h>
#elif __GNUC__ == 3
# include <linux/compiler-gcc3.h>
-#elif __GNUC__ == 2
-# include <linux/compiler-gcc2.h>
#else
# error Sorry, your compiler is too old/not recognized.
#endif
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
