Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 08:48:40PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
By the way, why does nr_pagecache needs to be an atomic variable on UP systems?
At least on X86 UP atomic doesn't use the LOCK prefix and is thus quite
cheap. I would expect other architectures who care about UP performance
(= not IA64) to be similar.
But in practice the variable does not need to be an atomic type for UP, but
simply a word, since stores are atomic on UP systems, no?
Several arches seem to use additional atomicity instructions on
atomic functions:
Yeah, this is to protect from interrupts and is common to most
load store architectures. It is possible we could have
atomic_xxx_irq / atomic_xxx_irqsave functions for these, however
I think nobody has yet demostrated the improvements outweigh the
complexity that would be added.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
