Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 06:34:16PM -0800, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> 
> > > For the BP case it's ok as 
> > > long as the beginning is correctly aligned and the rest 
> > > is read-only.
> > 
> > Just that any writes on the bp GDT will invalidate the idt_table cacheline,
> > which is read mostly (as Nippun pointed out).  So could we keep the padding
> > as it is for the BP too? 
> 
> But how often is this occuring? I presume this is for the virtualisation 

GDT writes happen often if you use threads with TLS.

> case only?

In this case for programs running on ScaleX86's hypervisor yes.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux