On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 00:26 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Well if the Xen people have such requirements they can submit > separate patches. Currently they don't seem to be interested > at all in submitting patches to mainline, so we must work > with the VM hackers who are interested in this (scalex86, VMware) > And AFAIK they only care about not having false sharing in there. > Agreed. Though do we need to have full page allocated for each gdt (256 bytes) then? ...possibly use kmalloc. -rohit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- From: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
- Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- References:
- Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
- Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- From: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
- Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- From: Rohit Seth <rohit.seth@intel.com>
- Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] include/asm-i386/acpi.h put missing header cousing build error
- Next by Date: [PATCH 1/1 2.6.15-rc4-git1] Fix switching to KD_TEXT
- Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- Next by thread: Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
- Index(es):
![]() |