On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:41:52PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Do you even know if this special case is applicable outside of Dell ICH5 > boxes? And I thought your previous messages were referring to ICH6? Every laptop I have access to, whether it's SATA or PATA, fires an ACPI notification when a drive is removed from a bay. The ICH5 case is probably somewhat special-cased, but when we move over to driving PATA with libata it's going to be a lot more useful. If ICH6 can be managed without resorting to ACPI, it's less necessary in the short term, but I think PATA support is going to require it in the end anyway (especially since we probably want to call the _GTM and _STM methods on PATA devices) -- Matthew Garrett | [email protected] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- References:
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Prev by Date: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Previous by thread: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Next by thread: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap
- Index(es):