* JANAK DESAI <[email protected]> wrote:
> To answer Ingo's question, we did look at other flags when I started.
> However, I wanted to keep the system call simple enough, with atleast
> namespace unsharing, so it would get accepted. In the original
> discussion on fsdevel, unsharing of vm was mentioned as useful so I
> added that in addition to namespace unsharing.
i think the only sane way to do this is to support unsharing for all
flags. Internally (i.e. in the patch-queue) it can still be structured
in a finegrained way, but in terms of exposing it to applications, it
should be an all or nothing solution i think.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
