Re: [PATCH -mm 1/5] New system call, unshare

* JANAK DESAI <[email protected]> wrote:

> [PATCH -mm 1/5] unshare system call: System call handler function 
> sys_unshare

>+       if (unshare_flags & ~(CLONE_NEWNS | CLONE_VM))
>+               goto errout;

just curious, did you consider all the other CLONE_* flags as well, to 
see whether it makes sense to add unshare support for them?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH -mm 1/5] New system call, unshare
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH -mm 1/5] New system call, unshare
    • From: JANAK DESAI <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Sluggish machine under 2.6.14 and 2.6.15-rc5
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Decrease number of pointer derefs in multipath.c
• Previous by thread: [PATCH -mm 1/5] New system call, unshare
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/5] New system call, unshare
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]