Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch

On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Unless non local same box is 2 times as slow as the local I wouldn't
> consider that correct.  (I would expect the Altix to do better than that) 

Maybe Jack could give us a hint how these slit numbers relate to 
reality?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Decrease number of pointer derefs in nfnetlink_queue.c
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc4 panic in __nr_to_section() with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
• Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH 1/3] Zone reclaim V3: main patch
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.15-rc5] media/video/bttv : enhance ioctl debug
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]