Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary

On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 15:45 -0800, Rohit Seth wrote:

> 
> 
> Agreed.  
> 
> Though do we need to have full page allocated for each gdt (256 bytes)
> then? ...possibly use kmalloc.
> 


sorry, forgot about the false sharing part.

-rohit

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
    • From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
    • From: Rohit Seth <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc4 panic in __nr_to_section() with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM
• Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] [patch] x86_64: align and pad x86_64 GDT on page boundary
• Next by thread: Everyone Need This Linux-ia64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]