On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 02:08:28PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jiri Benc wrote:
> >On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:38:37 -0500, Joseph Jezak wrote:
> >
> >>We're not writing an entire stack. We're writing a layer that sits in
> >>between the current ieee80211 stack that's already present in the kernel
> >>and drivers that do not have a hardware MAC. Since ieee80211 is already
> >>in use in the kernel today, this seemed like a natural and useful
> >>extension to the existing code. I agree that it's somewhat wasteful to
> >>keep rewriting 802.11 stacks and we considered other options, but it
> >>seemed like a more logical choice to work with what was available and
> >>recommended than to use an external stack.
> >
> >
> >Unfortunately, the only long-term solution is to rewrite completely the
> >current in-kernel ieee80211 code (I would not call it a "stack") or
> >replace it with something another. The current code was written for
> >Intel devices and it doesn't support anything else - so every developer
>
> Patently false.
>
> ieee80211 is used by Intel. Some bits used by HostAP, which also
> duplicates a lot of ieee80211 code. And bcm43xx. And another couple
> drivers found in -mm or out-of-tree.
Orinoco also uses it now no ?
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
