Hi, On Sunday 27 November 2005 15:11, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > But it worked properly before suspend/resume without noapic? > > > > Without noapic the timer has about the 2x speed compared to real-time. I > > only used the machien with noapic since otherwise it is barely useful. > > It has that still with the patch applied? The patch was supposed > to fix that at least part of that problem on ATI systems > (there seems to be also a timer miscalibration problem on some other > laptops) Sorry for the late reply, just too much to do ... It appears my MSI Megabook S270 with Ati chipset and AMD Turion freezes on boot with your patch applied to 2.6.14.2 after the io schedulers are registered. Without the patch it boots up fine. Yours, -- René Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany) http://www.exactcode.de | http://www.t2-project.org +49 (0)30 255 897 45
Attachment:
pgpRKNCvzexu4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- From: René Rebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- Prev by Date: 2.6.15-rc5-kj1
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
- Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- Index(es):