Hi,
On Sunday 27 November 2005 14:53, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:14:53AM +0100, Ren? Rebe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Saturday 26 November 2005 15:20, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Everybody who saw timing problems with ATI IXP based boards with x86-64
> > > or some Nvidia NForce4 boards please test this patch. Please send
> > > success/failure to me.
> >
> > I try to give your patch a try on the ATI based MSI Megabook S270, today -
> > however even with the workaround of "noapic" I had timer drift on resuem from
> > ram if the cpu was scaled to a lower frequency when it was suspended.
>
> But it worked properly before suspend/resume without noapic?
Without noapic the timer has about the 2x speed compared to real-time. I
only used the machien with noapic since otherwise it is barely useful.
Did you want to know if suspend/resume does behave differently without noapic?
Yours,
--
René Rebe - Rubensstr. 64 - 12157 Berlin (Europe / Germany)
http://www.exactcode.de | http://www.t2-project.org
+49 (0)30 255 897 45
Attachment:
pgpXw3FZZcReM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- From: René Rebe <[email protected]>
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown
- Next by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- Previous by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Test patch for ATI/Nvidia timer problems
- Index(es):
 |