Nicholas,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:29:26PM -0800, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 00:17 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:02:18PM -0800, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 23:43 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > To give an bad analogy RDTSC usage in the last years is
> > > > like explicit spinning wait loops for delays in the earlier
> > > > times. They tended to work on some subset of computers,
> > > > but were always bad and caused problems and people eventually learned
> > > > it was better to use operating system services for this.
> > >
> > > And you are now suggesting people should use RDPMC instead of OS
> > > services?
> >
> > For any kind of timers they should use the OS service
> > (gettimeofday/clock_gettime). The OS will go to extraordinary
> > means to make it as fast as possible, but when it's slow
> > then because it's not possible to do it faster accurately
> > (that's the case right now modulo one possible optimization)
> >
> > For cycle counting where they previously used RDTSC they should
> > use RDPMC 0 now.
>
> Well, if that's all you want them to use RDPMC 0 for, why not just make
> PMCs programmable from userspace?
>
Simply because write a PERFSEL (i.e. an MSR) register is a privileged operation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
