Re: [patch] warn-on-once.patch

> +#define WARN_ON_ONCE(condition)		\
> +do {					\
> +	static int warn_once = 1;	\
> +					\
> +	if (condition) {		\
> +		warn_once = 0;		\
> +		WARN_ON(1);		\
> +	}				\
> +} while (0);
              ^
Is the semicolon intentional?

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/13] Time: Generic Timeofday Subsystem (v B11)
  - From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/13] Time: Reduced NTP rework (part 1)
  - From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [patch] warn-on-once.patch
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] warn-on-once.patch
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 11/13] Time: x86-64 Conversion to Generic Timekeeping
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] warn-on-once.patch
Next by thread: Re: [patch] warn-on-once.patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]