On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 11:39:55AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 03:28:29PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > And here is an alternative patch that assumes that the answer to both
> > questions above is "no". It is shorter, though mostly due to use of
> > the list_splice_init() and list_for_each_entry_safe() primitives.
>
> Ok, I'll try it. But it may take time.
>
> Currently I'm running oprofile on linux-2.6.15-rc2-mm1. It seems the bug is not
> quite reproducible. I'll report again if there are any new findings.
Yep, the bug is indeed non-deterministic. For it to happen, softirq
must interrupt a "task_mortuary" critical section, and that softirq
must execute a task-struct RCU callback.
Thanx, Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
