On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 02:01:17PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> One concern on the attached patch is the possible effect on latency.
>
> John, any reason why the dead_tasks list cannot be spliced onto a
> local list, then freed outside of the task_mortuary lock? Any reason
> why the dying_tasks list cannot be spliced onto the dead_tasks list
> (an O(1) operation)?
And here is an alternative patch that assumes that the answer to both
questions above is "no". It is shorter, though mostly due to use of
the list_splice_init() and list_for_each_entry_safe() primitives.
Thanx, Paul
Signed-off-by: <[email protected]>
buffer_sync.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.14-mm2/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c linux-2.6.14-mm2-fixmortuary/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c
--- linux-2.6.14-mm2/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c 2005-10-27 17:02:08.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.14-mm2-fixmortuary/drivers/oprofile/buffer_sync.c 2005-11-25 14:51:26.000000000 -0800
@@ -46,10 +46,11 @@ static void process_task_mortuary(void);
*/
static int task_free_notify(struct notifier_block * self, unsigned long val, void * data)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
struct task_struct * task = data;
- spin_lock(&task_mortuary);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&task_mortuary, flags);
list_add(&task->tasks, &dying_tasks);
- spin_unlock(&task_mortuary);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task_mortuary, flags);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
@@ -431,25 +432,22 @@ static void increment_tail(struct oprofi
*/
static void process_task_mortuary(void)
{
- struct list_head * pos;
- struct list_head * pos2;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ LIST_HEAD(local_dead_tasks);
struct task_struct * task;
+ struct task_struct * ttask;
- spin_lock(&task_mortuary);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&task_mortuary, flags);
- list_for_each_safe(pos, pos2, &dead_tasks) {
- task = list_entry(pos, struct task_struct, tasks);
- list_del(&task->tasks);
- free_task(task);
- }
+ list_splice_init(&dead_tasks, &local_dead_tasks);
+ list_splice_init(&dying_tasks, &dead_tasks);
- list_for_each_safe(pos, pos2, &dying_tasks) {
- task = list_entry(pos, struct task_struct, tasks);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task_mortuary, flags);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(task, ttask, &local_dead_tasks, tasks) {
list_del(&task->tasks);
- list_add_tail(&task->tasks, &dead_tasks);
+ free_task(task);
}
-
- spin_unlock(&task_mortuary);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
