> Uhm... maybe we think of it differently, but typically I consider the > host rings (which is what I talked about above) as orthogonal to the > guest ring. To the host, the guest is just a process in ring 3. I don't think your thoughts match the terminology as used by Intel/AMD/Xen at least. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- References:
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] fs/hfsplus/: move the hfsplus_inode_check() prototype to hfsplus_fs.h
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Index(es):
 |