> THAT is what I'd like to have CPU support for. Not for UP (it's going > away), and not for the kernel (it's never single-threaded). There is one reasonly interesting special case that will probably stay around: single CPU guest in a virtualized environment. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- References:
- [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Gerd Knorr <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- [patch] SMP alternatives
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc2 pci_ids.h cleanup is a pain
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] SMP alternatives
- Index(es):
 |