On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 04:31:14AM -0800, Lever, Charles wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:13:14AM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote:
> >
> > > actually, can we hold off on this change? the RPC
> > transport switch will
> > > eventually need most of those EXPORT_SYMBOLs.
> >
> > Am I right to assume this will happen in the foreseeable future?
>
> the first portion of the transport switch is in 2.6.15-rcX. at this
> point i'm expecting the EXPORT_SYMBOL changes to go in 2.6.17 or later.
OK.
> so i don't remember why you are removing xdr_decode_string. are we sure
> that no-one will need this functionality in the future? it is harmless
> to remove today, but i wonder if someone is just going to add it back
> sometime.
It's unused and you said:
the only harmless change i see below is removing xdr_decode_string().
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
